NLA Volleyball League Men 2017/2018

Playoff semifinal + PO 5.-6. 7.-8.

NLA Volleyball League Men 2017/2018 Best players MIDDLE BLOCKER
PlayerPlayedBlockBlockServeServeAttackAttackRanking
  MS#=/TotBl ind.Bl ind.#=/TotSv ind.Sv ind.#=/TotSp ind.Sp ind.Index

1

von Burg Mischa
(TV Schönenwerd I)

1

3

4

1

0

7

0.0305

0.0305

0

1

1

14

0.0076

0.0076

4

1

1

7

0.8571

0.8571

0.5321

2

Amstutz Nick
(Volley Top Luzern)

1

3

1

1

0

2

0.0072

0.0072

3

1

1

17

0.0288

0.0288

4

1

1

6

1

1

0.49878

3

Mote Nehemiah
(Volley Amriswil I)

2

9

11

13

0

27

0.0271

0.0271

1

4

0

27

0.0025

0.0025

13

2

3

27

2.6667

2.6667

0.48891

4

Hensler Ben
(VBC Einsiedeln)

1

3

4

3

0

7

0.0288

0.0288

0

1

0

8

0

0

6

1

0

11

1.3636

1.3636

0.48443

5

Ehrat Samuel
(biogas volley näfels I)

2

9

6

8

0

16

0.0148

0.0148

5

2

1

31

0.0148

0.0148

5

3

4

17

-1.0588

-1.0588

0.47064

6

Zerika Karim
(Lausanne UC I)

3

11

7

13

1

28

0.0142

0.0142

5

8

0

43

0.0101

0.0101

9

2

0

16

4.8125

4.8125

0.45414

7

Botas Dos Santos Rui
(Chênois Genève Volleyball I)

3

11

7

11

0

24

0.0142

0.0142

3

7

1

33

0.0081

0.0081

14

2

1

29

4.1724

4.1724

0.44305

8

Häfliger Marcel
(Volley Top Luzern)

1

1

2

2

0

4

0.0144

0.0144

0

0

0

3

0

0

5

0

0

6

0.8333

0.8333

0.39914

9

Heidrich Florian
(TSV Jona Volleyball)

1

2

1

1

0

2

0.0076

0.0076

0

0

1

3

0.0076

0.0076

1

0

2

6

-0.3333

-0.3333

0.39516

10

Pranko Vadzim
(Lausanne UC I)

3

11

4

15

0

26

0.0081

0.0081

0

8

1

27

0.002

0.002

13

1

3

23

4.3043

4.3043

0.37883

11

Ljubicic Aleksandar
(Volley Amriswil I)

1

5

2

2

0

4

0.0098

0.0098

0

0

0

17

0

0

4

0

2

9

1.1111

1.1111

0.37368

12

Maag Joel
(TSV Jona Volleyball)

1

3

1

2

0

3

0.0076

0.0076

0

1

0

9

0

0

3

1

0

8

0.75

0.75

0.36108

13

Frame Christopher
(Volley Top Luzern)

1

2

1

2

0

3

0.0072

0.0072

0

1

0

7

0

0

2

0

1

6

0.3333

0.3333

0.35801

14

Brändli Thomas
(biogas volley näfels I)

2

6

2

4

0

7

0.0049

0.0049

1

1

0

11

0.0025

0.0025

1

1

0

2

0

0

0.35636

15

Walzer Marc
(biogas volley näfels I)

2

7

2

5

0

8

0.0049

0.0049

0

3

0

16

0

0

6

1

2

14

1.5

1.5

0.34748

16

Abramov Stépan
(Chênois Genève Volleyball I)

3

8

0

2

0

4

0

0

0

3

1

27

0.002

0.002

6

0

0

11

4.3636

4.3636

0.33456

17

Dustinac Enes
(Chênois Genève Volleyball I)

3

9

1

4

0

6

0.002

0.002

0

3

0

13

0

0

3

3

0

7

0

0

0.32971

18

Kesten Marko
(Volley Amriswil I)

1

4

0

2

0

3

0

0

0

1

0

15

0

0

2

0

0

6

1.3333

1.3333

0.32109

19

Bolli Moritz
(TSV Jona Volleyball)

1

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

4

0

0

1

0

0

2

1

1

0.3206

20

Bochsler Oliver
(VBC Einsiedeln)

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.31911

Ranking Calculation

Middle-Blocker

the ranking takes into account:

  • Serve Index (Sv ind.): positive serves divided the total points of both teams (ranking is available only if the player has made at least one serve per set)

  • Attack Index (Sp ind.): positive attacks minus negative attacks divided the total attacks (ranking is available only if the player has made at least three attacks per set)

  • Block Index (Bl ind.): positive blocks divided the total points of both teams

The final ranking is based on the final “index” which determines the impact of the role on the game, in other words the importance of the role towards the win probability. This final Index is calculated considering the indexes for each single skill (“ind.” columns) and a coefficient which indicates the “importance” of the role to determine the probability of success for the team. Each single skill index is calculated considering the positive and negative skills based on the number of points played from the teams and multiplied for a coefficient which indicates the importance of the skill for that role to determine the probability of success for the team. The icons next to each skill column give an idea about the “weight” of the skill determining the probability of success for the team in this role. The final Index is calculated also considering the following criteria:

  • Minimum number of Serves per set:  1

  • Minimum number of Spikes per set:  1

Serve

  • # serve ace

  • / half point

  • = serve error

Attack

  • # point

  • / blocked

  • = error

Block

  • # point

  • / Net touch

  • = hand out

Filters applied

  • Minimum number of Matches played:  1