Volleyball League Men 2016/2017

Playoff semifinal + PO 5.-6. 7.-8.

Volleyball League Men 2016/2017 Best players MIDDLE BLOCKER
PlayerPlayedBlockBlockServeServeAttackAttackRanking
  MS#=/TotBl ind.Bl ind.#=/TotSv ind.Sv ind.#=/TotSp ind.Sp ind.Index

1

Van Berkel Lucas
(Volley Amriswil I)

2

8

10

2

0

22

0.027

0.027

1

0

2

32

0.0081

0.0081

17

0

0

23

5.913

5.913

0.52166

2

Ehrat Samuel
(biogas volley näfels I)

2

9

7

1

0

8

0.0178

0.0178

4

4

2

30

0.0153

0.0153

13

1

2

21

4.2857

4.2857

0.50024

3

Ljubicic Aleksandar
(Volley Amriswil I)

2

8

7

3

0

16

0.0189

0.0189

0

1

2

26

0.0054

0.0054

14

2

3

23

3.1304

3.1304

0.45539

4

Botas Dos Santos Rui
(Chênois Genève Volleyball I)

3

11

9

1

0

17

0.0169

0.0169

3

7

0

45

0.0056

0.0056

28

1

3

36

7.3333

7.3333

0.45171

5

Stevanovic Radisa
(Lausanne UC I)

2

8

6

4

0

14

0.0162

0.0162

0

9

1

26

0.0027

0.0027

13

3

2

24

2.6667

2.6667

0.42551

6

Heidrich Florian
(Burgstein Vitamine Volley Jona)

3

11

7

2

0

12

0.0131

0.0131

1

2

0

44

0.0019

0.0019

20

0

2

31

6.3871

6.3871

0.40991

7

Zoodsma Rutger
(Burgstein Vitamine Volley Jona)

1

3

2

0

0

2

0.0155

0.0155

0

0

0

5

0

0

3

1

0

4

1.5

1.5

0.40664

8

Frame Christopher
(TV Schönenwerd I)

2

6

4

2

0

8

0.0102

0.0102

2

1

0

21

0.0051

0.0051

4

0

0

9

2.6667

2.6667

0.40243

9

Hänggi Christoph
(TV Schönenwerd I)

2

9

5

0

0

8

0.0127

0.0127

0

1

0

23

0

0

12

0

1

19

5.2105

5.2105

0.39677

10

Koncilja Danjiel
(Lausanne UC I)

2

7

2

5

0

11

0.0054

0.0054

1

2

1

24

0.0054

0.0054

11

1

0

25

2.8

2.8

0.37694

11

Walzer Marc
(biogas volley näfels I)

2

5

2

0

0

3

0.0051

0.0051

2

1

0

16

0.0051

0.0051

6

1

0

11

2.2727

2.2727

0.373

12

Abramov Stépan
(Chênois Genève Volleyball I)

2

7

2

0

0

2

0.006

0.006

1

5

0

31

0.003

0.003

6

1

0

11

3.1818

3.1818

0.36996

13

Hofstede Simon
(TV Schönenwerd I)

2

6

3

0

0

3

0.0076

0.0076

0

1

0

18

0

0

3

0

1

7

1.7143

1.7143

0.36259

14

Roosewelt De Oliveira Vasconcelos Filho
(biogas volley näfels I)

2

6

3

3

0

6

0.0076

0.0076

0

2

0

13

0

0

7

2

1

15

1.6

1.6

0.36241

15

Jaquet Damien
(Chênois Genève Volleyball I)

2

5

2

1

0

5

0.0049

0.0049

1

3

0

16

0.0025

0.0025

5

0

1

8

2.5

2.5

0.36037

16

Brändli Thomas
(Volley Amriswil I)

2

6

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

12

0

0

0

0

1

1

-6

-6

0.31911

17

Maag Joel
(Burgstein Vitamine Volley Jona)

2

4

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

7

0

0

0

1

0

1

-4

-4

0.31911

18

Altanov Vassil
(Lausanne UC I)

2

2

0

1

0

3

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

1

2

6

-0.6667

-0.6667

0.31813

Ranking Calculation

Middle-Blocker

the ranking takes into account:

  • Serve Index (Sv ind.): positive serves divided the total points of both teams (ranking is available only if the player has made at least one serve per set)

  • Attack Index (Sp ind.): positive attacks minus negative attacks divided the total attacks (ranking is available only if the player has made at least three attacks per set)

  • Block Index (Bl ind.): positive blocks divided the total points of both teams

The final ranking is based on the final “index” which determines the impact of the role on the game, in other words the importance of the role towards the win probability. This final Index is calculated considering the indexes for each single skill (“ind.” columns) and a coefficient which indicates the “importance” of the role to determine the probability of success for the team. Each single skill index is calculated considering the positive and negative skills based on the number of points played from the teams and multiplied for a coefficient which indicates the importance of the skill for that role to determine the probability of success for the team. The icons next to each skill column give an idea about the “weight” of the skill determining the probability of success for the team in this role. The final Index is calculated also considering the following criteria:

  • Minimum number of Serves per set:  1

  • Minimum number of Spikes per set:  1

Serve

  • # serve ace

  • / half point

  • = serve error

Attack

  • # point

  • / blocked

  • = error

Block

  • # point

  • / Net touch

  • = hand out

Filters applied

  • Minimum number of Matches played:  1